Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Saturday, January 30, 2010
LEGAL RESEARCH
If you are a victim of law and require detailed research for your case, contact THE DOMESTIC JUSTICE PROJECT at (704) 900-6290 and a research associate will be happy to speak with you.
Wednesday, October 3, 2007
VIctim of Law
Who is a Victim-of-Law?
Victims-of-Law are persons who have been subjected to tyrannical or arbitrary rulings or edicts in violation of constitutional and civil rights under the democratic maxim reminiscent of our Republic -- the "Rule of Law"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The victims of unethical and corrupt lawyers, judges and employees of the state and federal judiciary demand accountability from those who abuse the power of office while they remain absolutely immune. The media as well as the legislative and executive branches of government traditionally ignore these abuses. The judicial branch itself hurls insults at the victim claiming they are nothing more than a 'disgruntled litigant' while ignoring substantive allegations.
It is essential to empower the victims of legal abuses. Our strength is in our numbers thus the more people that demand their constitutional and civil rights the quicker they will be attained.
What most people do not comprehend is that judges are immune from civil lawsuits. If a judge unlawfully imprisoned someone or maliciously denied due process in a case that cost a litigant millions of dollars, it doesn't matter. There is no redress for the aggrieved person.
The emotional and physical health problems inherent in these abuses are now coming to light but the judicial branches throughout our country continue to avoid or deliberately ignore what they have helped to create.
What is the "Rule of Law"?
Equality and the Law
The right to equality before the law, or equal protection of the law as it is often phrased, is fundamental to any just and democratic society. Whether rich or poor, ethnic majority or religious minority, political ally of the state or opponent--all are entitled to equal protection before the law.
The democratic state cannot guarantee that life will treat everyone equally, and it has no responsibility to do so. However, writes constitutional law expert John P. Frank, "Under no circumstances should the state impose additional inequalities; it should be required to deal evenly and equally with all of its people."
No one is above the law, which is, after all, the creation of the people, not something imposed upon them. The citizens of a democracy submit to the law because they recognize that, however indirectly, they are submitting to themselves as makers of the law. When laws are established by the people who then have to obey them, both law and democracy are served.
Reprinted from the National Constitution Center
The Supreme Court
The Framers considered the rule of law essential to the safekeeping of social order and civil liberties. The rule of law holds that if our relationships with each other and with the state are governed by a set of rules, rather than by a group of individuals, we are less likely to fall victim to authoritarian rule. The rule of law calls for both individuals and the government to submit to the law's supremacy. By precluding both the individual and the state from transcending the supreme law of the land, the Framers constructed another protective layer over individual rights and liberties. --Reprinted from U.S. Dept. of State
Judicial Immunity is Absolute
In an unprecedented degree of 'abuse of power' judges decreed themselves absolutely immune from civil suit when they are "acting maliciously and corruptly." In 1996 the 104th Congress passed the Federal Courts Improvement Act amending the Civil Rights statute to give further immunities to malicious and corrupt judges.
The Judicial Doctrine of Immunity
"Immunity applies even when the judge is accused of
acting maliciously and corruptly." -- United States Supreme Court
See Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 815-819 (1982) Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S., at 554, Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 9-10, 112 S.Ct. 286, 287, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991).
Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1996
Public Law 104-317, 104th Congress
Sec. 309. Prohibition against awards of costs, including attorney's fees, and injunctive relief against a judicial officer.
(a) Nonliability <> for Costs.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no judicial officer shall be held liable for any costs, including attorney's fees, in any action brought against such officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, unless such action was clearly in excess of such officer's jurisdiction.
(b) Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights.--Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end thereof ``, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity such officer shall not be held liable for any costs, including attorney's fees, unless such action was clearly in excess of such officer's jurisdiction''.
(c) Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights.--Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the first sentence: ``, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable''.
Victims-of-Law are persons who have been subjected to tyrannical or arbitrary rulings or edicts in violation of constitutional and civil rights under the democratic maxim reminiscent of our Republic -- the "Rule of Law"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The victims of unethical and corrupt lawyers, judges and employees of the state and federal judiciary demand accountability from those who abuse the power of office while they remain absolutely immune. The media as well as the legislative and executive branches of government traditionally ignore these abuses. The judicial branch itself hurls insults at the victim claiming they are nothing more than a 'disgruntled litigant' while ignoring substantive allegations.
It is essential to empower the victims of legal abuses. Our strength is in our numbers thus the more people that demand their constitutional and civil rights the quicker they will be attained.
What most people do not comprehend is that judges are immune from civil lawsuits. If a judge unlawfully imprisoned someone or maliciously denied due process in a case that cost a litigant millions of dollars, it doesn't matter. There is no redress for the aggrieved person.
The emotional and physical health problems inherent in these abuses are now coming to light but the judicial branches throughout our country continue to avoid or deliberately ignore what they have helped to create.
What is the "Rule of Law"?
Equality and the Law
The right to equality before the law, or equal protection of the law as it is often phrased, is fundamental to any just and democratic society. Whether rich or poor, ethnic majority or religious minority, political ally of the state or opponent--all are entitled to equal protection before the law.
The democratic state cannot guarantee that life will treat everyone equally, and it has no responsibility to do so. However, writes constitutional law expert John P. Frank, "Under no circumstances should the state impose additional inequalities; it should be required to deal evenly and equally with all of its people."
No one is above the law, which is, after all, the creation of the people, not something imposed upon them. The citizens of a democracy submit to the law because they recognize that, however indirectly, they are submitting to themselves as makers of the law. When laws are established by the people who then have to obey them, both law and democracy are served.
Reprinted from the National Constitution Center
The Supreme Court
The Framers considered the rule of law essential to the safekeeping of social order and civil liberties. The rule of law holds that if our relationships with each other and with the state are governed by a set of rules, rather than by a group of individuals, we are less likely to fall victim to authoritarian rule. The rule of law calls for both individuals and the government to submit to the law's supremacy. By precluding both the individual and the state from transcending the supreme law of the land, the Framers constructed another protective layer over individual rights and liberties. --Reprinted from U.S. Dept. of State
Judicial Immunity is Absolute
In an unprecedented degree of 'abuse of power' judges decreed themselves absolutely immune from civil suit when they are "acting maliciously and corruptly." In 1996 the 104th Congress passed the Federal Courts Improvement Act amending the Civil Rights statute to give further immunities to malicious and corrupt judges.
The Judicial Doctrine of Immunity
"Immunity applies even when the judge is accused of
acting maliciously and corruptly." -- United States Supreme Court
See Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 815-819 (1982) Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S., at 554, Mireles v. Waco, 502 U.S. 9, 9-10, 112 S.Ct. 286, 287, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991).
Federal Courts Improvement Act of 1996
Public Law 104-317, 104th Congress
Sec. 309. Prohibition against awards of costs, including attorney's fees, and injunctive relief against a judicial officer.
(a) Nonliability <
(b) Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights.--Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended by inserting before the period at the end thereof ``, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity such officer shall not be held liable for any costs, including attorney's fees, unless such action was clearly in excess of such officer's jurisdiction''.
(c) Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights.--Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the first sentence: ``, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable''.
Thursday, August 9, 2007
DID YOU KNOW?...
Did you know that phonetaps are common during hotly contested domestic litigation? It is ILLEGAL and UNETHICAL. If you suspect your phone is being tapped, take action immediately and secure your privacy. Remove all land lines, or limit usage to "generic" and secure calls. Assume you are being listened to, because if you are being sued by an unethical law firm, you are! Keep your cell phone number private and use it in a secured area. Cell phones are easy to tap with radio equipment.
LEGAL ABUSE SYNDROME
Legal Abuse Syndrome
WARNING: Protracted litigation can be hazardous to your health.
You know you have traumatic stress when:
•Ø there are no words to describe how you feel...
•Ø your heart is saying, I CAN'T STAND TO BE HERE, NOW
•Ø Peace, rest and recuperation are prevented by intrusive thoughts and emotions
Our's is a time of injustice due to ethical violations, legal abuses and Fraud on the Court.
What do we do about it? See "Current Hot Topics."
Professional Ethics Violations and Abuse of the Legal Process are a growing problem in our nation and our courts of law.
Legal Abuse Syndrome is a psycholegal trauma (a form of post traumatic stress disorder), which often develops in individuals assaulted by ethical violations, legal abuses, betrayals, and fraud. Abuse of power and authority and a profound lack of accountability in our courts have become rampant. This adds greatly to the original distress requiring court assistance in the first place.
This stress can and does lead to physical illness. AMA statistics show that around 85% of all physical illness is directly attributable to stress. Legal Abuse Syndrome is a public health menace in this country; it leads to massive medical intervention costs, burdens insurance companies significantly, and adds to Medicare and Social Security costs. Legal Abuse Syndrome is detrimental to all of society, and nobody is immune.
Whatever the court setting, whether it is regarding divorce, child custody, parental support, probate matters, personal injury, property disputes, legal or medical malpractice, criminal charges or other deeply personal issues, the frauds put forth in our courts add greatly to the trauma. When litigants are unable to get fair resolution to their issues, when the court dysfunction further adds to the litigant's burden, when no amount of actual case law compels an equitable outcome, litigants suffer often disabling levels of stress. When further attempts to achieve redress fail, litigants display the hallmark signs of Legal Abuse Syndrome.
Learn how to Overcome the Devastation of Legal Abuse Syndrome, and become empowered once again.
To order your copy of Legal Abuse Syndrome, click here.
To learn more about PTSD, see http://traumacenter.org.
To request more information about Legal Abuse Syndrome, please click here.
PLEASE PARTICIPATE IN THE LEGAL ABUSE SYNDROME STUDY; Send an e-mail to REDRESS2@redressinc.org, and note "Study Participant" the the subject line. All responses held in strictest confidence. The results will help to devise effective court protocol which will benefit litigants (whether represented by lawyers or in self-representation) along with the courts.
NOTICE: The term "Legal Abuse Syndrome" and the materials contained within "Overcoming the Devastation of Legal Abuse Syndrome" are copyrighted to Karin Huffer. Any entity wishing to use the term or material must obtain Ms. Huffer's prior written permission.
Friday, February 23, 2007
Did you know?.....
Often when mothers internalize a threat to themselves or their children during custody litigation they become emotional. Abusive attorneys will capitalize on this vulnerability and accuse the frightened or traumatized mother of having a mental disorder or illness in effort to build a case that she is unfit, and bill expensive legal hours to their client which benefits their firm and their legal career. By blowing the whistle on this behavior and exposing the truth you can put a stop to this abusive and unethical practice in America.
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
